Conversation

i really dislike the word "misinformation" / "disinformation." it's presumptuous to assert that you know what constitutes "information" and what constitutes "not information" and underhanded to make it an implicit part of the frame so it's harder to notice and object to
19
46
360
people who are spreading plague conspiracy theories or w/e in good faith are *trying to do it right*: they have actual opinions about important things and they are trying to improve other people's lives by telling them about it this is normal prosocial human behavior
5
7
90
whose job did it used to be? idk but if i had to bullshit about it, first the church and then TV? at some point the cover story was "scientists" but now it's nobody's job and everybody's job. lots of people are applying for the position and it's an uncomfortable power scramble
2
5
70
Same! It’s hard to tell from within a language what the gaps are without in depth knowledge of another. I feel like maybe English has the words (see below), but maybe not to the same degree...
Quote Tweet
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
I’d say “assertion” is a good neutral word for this; it implies a statement of truth from the perspective of the speaker, without implying truth/falsehood. “Claim” is better in certain circumstances but has connotations of skepticism, which may not always be helpful.
2
Replying to
Generally the idea is that a lie is ontologically pure--it doesn't matter how much poop is in a sandwich, the whole sandwich is inedible. I'd be fascinated if any other languages had this concept. German doesn't, and we've run out of languages I know. Or we could say "opinion."
2