Conversation

If I have an endomorphism f:X->X of a finite set, then it induces a map Z[X]->Z[X], and the trace of that counts fixed points of f this is a de-homotopification of the lefshetz fixed point theorem in a way that i would like to understand better
3
12
iirc one of the monoidal duality papers explains this special case pretty well. it goes something like, Z[X] is a symmetric monoidal functor from (finite sets + finite spans) to f.g. abelian groups, so sends traces to traces, and traces of spans count fixed points
1
Replying to and
I think Dold's paper introducing duality actually proves Lefschetz that way. The point being that a monoidal functor preserves dualizable objects and thus traces, and Dold shows that the trace in some category of spaces (maybe actually the Spanier Whitehead category) is just
1
Show replies