Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
QC (in Berlin 7/29-??? w/ COVID 😷)
@QiaochuYuan
seems to me that most of the interesting interpretive work is happening deep in the reader’s unconscious, almost inherently inaccessible to any kind of rationally legible testing framework, and that this is fine and good actually
1
12
QC (in Berlin 7/29-??? w/ COVID 😷)
@QiaochuYuan
also seems to me that the kind of phenomena accessible to exploration via “statistically-significant sample sizes” are the kind where you can assume away differences between people that are exactly the focus of magical or spiritual practice
1
7
NFT profile picture
gingervitiz.eth 🌻
@_gingervitiz
perhaps! it's entirely possible to make that error, but also possible to examine those factors. my question is, if a phenomenon resists any attempt to look straight at it, does it really exist?
1
3
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
QC (in Berlin 7/29-??? w/ COVID 😷)
@QiaochuYuan
another reason it's hard to test ideas for having good sex is that they're actually hard to transmit. stuff like "pay more attention to your partner" refers to a pretty complex set of skills and there are lots of individual obstacles to being able to make use of those skills
1
7
Show replies