Conversation

Show replies
Replying to and
As Jordan says, that's exactly what makes it a (good) choice! You start by saying "I'd like the category of sets to have these properties; how can I choose my definitions to give me those properties?" And this choice solves those problems and mostly doesn't cause any.
1
You're not starting from well-defined consensus rules and deriving this fact; you're starting with a desired outcome, and choosing your axioms so you get it. Which is, like, half of doing math. And it's not a criticism, and this is the definition I use too in most circumstances.
1
1
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
It's axiomatic, sure. But axioms are _always_ choices. That's what makes them axioms and not theorems! You want the category of sets to have these nice properties, and so you choose axioms that make that happen. But if you had other goals, you could choose other axioms.
1
1
3
Show replies