now, here we are on twitter, which makes money off of generating conversations where as many participants are triggered as possible; that's how you build the outrage cycle, that's how you generate drama and hate-clicks and hate-QTs and engagement
this is Bad, Actually (10/n)
Conversation
twitter is like a competition to see who in the world can summon the most dangerous demon and people get better at it every day (11/n)
Quote Tweet
slightly troubling to note that if I made decisions by polling The People... The People would drag me straight to hell,,, (as a treat)
you cannot really summon fractional demons, that's the tricky thing about demons. you summon it and it typically consumes everything
Show this thread
GIF
1
3
48
there's a big conversation to be had, beyond the scope of this thread, about how to redesign social media so that it does not encourage demon summoning quite so hard, but in the meantime what we all personally can do is strive to be kinder online (12/n)
2
2
46
using twitter in a way that is focused on kindness means actively fighting twitter's tendency to pull you towards hatred; this is part of what i read into 's description of being Very Online as an "extreme sport" (13/n)
Quote Tweet
the trick to being Extremely Online in a way that doesn't involve turning into a shell script is... you have to learn to surf the chaos of other people
it is said that hell is other people; there is a truth to that
what I do is a form of hell-surfing
it's an extreme sport
Show this thread
2
3
51
a big part of how i try to be on twitter is
1) i try not to start conversations i think will produce triggering dynamics, and
2) if i somehow end up in one and get triggered, i try to name that i'm triggered and pause or leave the conversation to work through it (14/n)
1
1
40
the point of naming that i'm triggered is to remove my own plausible deniability. most people just "tweet through it" and there's a name for that for a reason. your reasoning becomes extremely untrustworthy, everything becomes about proving you were right at all costs (15/n)
1
37
a funny meta-note i kinda have to add to this is that the word "trigger" has itself become charged and politicized
i think the way this happened is that people weaponized "X triggered me, therefore X is bad"
this is the opposite of what i'm saying (16/n)
3
39
my experience has consistently been that "X triggered me" is much more about me than it is about X, and that focusing on the me part of that interaction is much better for my sanity than blaming X for making me feel bad, which just never ever ever ever works (17/n)
4
6
76
How do you feel about intentionally triggering "for the lolz"? How do we talk about that kind of malice and disrespect? I should not need a suit of armor to tolerate hate, I think you'd agree.
2
1
I do take your point that it's a valuable skill to recognize "feelings happen" and we can regard them and decide what they mean, other than the intuitive reactionary response.
But it's asking a lot of the recipient, and not everyone can get there.
1
1
Replying to
yes for sure, i'm trying to explain myself and at least point towards this as a possibility for anyone who feels drawn to it, wouldn't be a universal standard i'd want to impose, lots of people just do not have the resources (mental, emotional, social, etc.) for it