Conversation

okay so I think I have a satisfying answer to this now... the bit about BG being a homotopy quotient is a bit of a red herring. If we are thinking in terms of ∞-groupoids, then BG simply *is* G but viewed as a(n) (∞)-groupoid 1/k i guess idk how long this is gonna go
Quote Tweet
related question: what is the "best" way to see the fact that the homotopy quotient of a point by G is the classifying space for principal G-bundles. By "best" I mean something like... formally in the language of ∞-groupoids......
Show this thread
3
1
4
we should really just be talking about fibrations in general we might wanna be able to say something like "fibrations over X with (homotopy?) fiber F are classified by ___________" 3/k
1
1
here F could be all sorts of things. The easiest to think about is if F is just a set (or a really a setoid I guess). But we might also want to allow F to be a higher groupoid in it's own right... later 4/k
1
1
Also instead of being "just" a set(oid), F might have some extra structure, e.g. a vector space or some other algebraic gadget... for G-bundles, we are talking about fibrations of G-spaces where the (homotopy?) fiber is the left(or is right better?) action of G on itself
1
1
so I think that what should happen in general is that F-fibrations are classified by maps to the delooping of Aut(F) umm I'm a little unclear about whether I should be talking about pointed or unpointed stuff here... 6/k
1
1
if F is just a set(oid) then Aut(F) is just a group, and it's delooping is a groupoid, and this should recover the classification of (associated bundles of) Aut(F)-principal bundles by maps to B(Aut(F)) 7/k
1
1
if F is something fancier, say an n-groupoid... then I'm not quite sure but I *think* that makes Aut(F) an n-group and its delooping an (n+1)-groupoid... I definitely need to think about this more lmao 8/k
2
1
okay so why should this be true? well suppose we have a fibration F->E->X we need to get a map X->BAut(F) from this data where ofc by "map" I mean "morphism of ∞-groupoids"... I'm a bit confused cuz it *feels like* I want everything to be pointed, so maybe ∞-groups... 9/k
2
1
Replying to
hmmm so I guess I've kinda been keeping a basepoint around for X the whole time just because I like being able to say "F is the fiber over the base point" but like that's not really doing any work so yeah I should dump it alright cool
1
1
Show replies