if your ideology is social justice, you might fill the "sin-shaped hole" with e.g. whiteness or patriarchy. in this situation, in order to call out something that you feel emotionally is a sin you *must* contort it into whiteness, patriarchy, etc.
-
-
Show this thread
-
this produces a blindspot where you become unable to acknowledge sins that you haven't been able to classify as whiteness, patriarchy, etc. e.g. emotional manipulation and abuse by women (unless they're white! then you can use "white feminism")
Show this thread -
we might talk in terms of there being a "concept economy," and of ideologies competing to satisfy demand for concepts like "a concept of sin" and "a concept of virtue"
Show this thread -
"concept economy" raises the question: where is the emerging demand for genuinely new concepts (not just old concepts that were taken off the market) and what do people need those new concepts for?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i'm not anywhere close to convinced that the Xs here are deep and fundamental in general, as opposed to being deep and fundamental in the dominant culture i could buy that social justice is a descendent ideology from christianity, or something like that, which explains this case
-
yeah, maybe those were not quite the words i wanted, descending from christianity is a reasonable take and others have made this and similar claims (e.g. moldbug,
@Meaningness)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's very common for colonial elites to align with the colonizer and exclude minorities as a way to assert their belonging with the powerful, which is off course an illusion. So there I've assigned this sin to a valid hole in my ideology, but I'm aware nothing is that simple.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.