_Meaningness_, the book, is weirdly bimodal. It clicks for some readers; others find it nonsensical.
I'd like to test a hypothesis from @andy_matuschak: it makes sense to meditators.
Do you meditate? Does it make sense? (Please don't answer unless you've attempted to read.)
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness @andy_matuschak
i tried reading it once 3-4 years ago, i think when it was linked on SSC, and i did ‘t get anything out of it. then i tried again in late 2018, after meditating, circling, and some other vaguely “spiritual” experiences, and it was the best thing i read in 2018
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
there was some kind of developmental stage or something i hadn’t attained the first time and had the second; i imagine meditation is one way to produce the relevant transition and that there are others
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
It seems like the relevant difference might actually be - are you reading Meaningness for self-improvement? - or reading it to understand the world? I'm in the "understand the world" camp, and don't care about the self-improvements angles.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
that doesn't seem particularly relevant to the shift i experienced. for me it was more like, before having various experiences in 2017-2018, i had no concept of what it meant to take meaning and meaning-making as object (in the subject-object shift sense)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.