Wait, what makes you think I have a strategy that can scale?
-
-
Replying to @RichDecibels @SentientBonobo and
As a first pass - crews and congregations as a bootstrapping strategy for the minimum viable self-sovereignty needed to do the work of changing the paperclip maximiser?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @utotranslucence @RichDecibels and
Your micro-solidarity model is replicable without your or anyone else’s intervention. Plus, I’ve hazarded a guess that you might have other interesting ideas in your brain that haven’t been pulled out publicly yet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @utotranslucence @SentientBonobo and
So far I've got good marketing but no proof that it's possible to reliably nudge people from individualism to relationality. It could be a fundamentally mysterious problem with no context-independent solution. Glad to have your confidence though!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RichDecibels @utotranslucence and
I have opinions about this! Circling / authentic relating was a key for me, as was basically trauma work - got a lot easier to be relational when I got emotionally unblocked enough that I could actually feel other people. Suspect this is a big barrier for many others.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @QiaochuYuan @utotranslucence and
I wonder how far it can stretch. Eg does effective circling require face to face transmission down a lineage of mastery?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RichDecibels @utotranslucence and
It does sorta seem that way to me, but fortunately that transmission can happen during circling itself!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QiaochuYuan @utotranslucence and
Also how do you know if you are on the right track or slightly off course and stuck in a developmental dead-end?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RichDecibels @QiaochuYuan and
I'm not questioning your practice, just saying these things are very subtle so I'm a long way from claiming I know how it scales
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RichDecibels @utotranslucence and
Yeah, makes sense. It's a good question, there are different schools of circling that disagree on how to do it and what it's for, and there are lots of subtle ways to fuck it up, shadow / ego / etc. getting in the way, spiritual narcissism type dynamics.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Circling done well can reveal all of this but it requires a certain minimal level of skill on the part of at least one person in the circle (or the facilitator, depending on style). If everyone in the circle sort of falls under the sway of a thing then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
-
Replying to @QiaochuYuan @RichDecibels and
I had an awesome time being led by a pro. have tried to run circles myself once or twice afterwards but couldn't get the magic started.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brownian19 @QiaochuYuan and
there are authentic relating games that are easier. eye gaze, only questions of genuine curiosity, non-sequitur convo.https://www.authrev.com/ar-games/
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.