i want this but with 2-7 other people instead of 1https://twitter.com/fortelabs/status/1123690995072290817 …
-
-
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
Malcolm 🙃cean Retweeted Malcolm 🙃cean
That was also my first thought, basically. (In
@RichDecibels' terms, a Crew instead of a Dyad)https://twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/status/1108865261233491968 …Malcolm 🙃cean added,
Malcolm 🙃cean @Malcolm_OceanReally great point in this article from@RichDecibels. Definitions: - Dyad = group of 2 - Crew = group of 3-8 - Congregation = close group of 30-200, potentially made of Crews - Crowd = group of more than 200 people Source: https://medium.com/enspiral-tales/microsolidarity-part-2-a-theory-of-groups-and-groups-of-groups-7c6e7ce63eda … pic.twitter.com/AxUA4EDDBgShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Malcolm 🙃cean Retweeted
Also I think that once you're above 2 people the kids thing becomes a totally different prospect. It takes a crew... it takes a congregation... it takes a crowd? https://twitter.com/utotranslucence/status/1124065714682437633 …
Malcolm 🙃cean added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Malcolm_Ocean @RichDecibels
Yeah, kids is definitely on my list of things I think a crew can do better than monogamy.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm not willing to have kids until I feel confident the 2 of us as parents wouldn't be alone in their raising, at least for their early years. This is a hard boundary for me. I'd sooner skip kid-having entirely than undertake it as a dyad.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
Big mood. This whole two-parent nuclear family thing was never workable, I think. Lots of thoughts and feelings here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.