Fun convo with @csvoss: categorizing foods + organisms based on how much they've been optimized by natural selection to be edible. Easiest examples: milk, (botanical) fruits, honey all optimized to be eaten by something. Seeds and eggs optimized to become an organism.
-
Show this thread
-
Examples I hadn't thought about: root vegetables (carrots, potatoes, etc.) are storage organs, optimized for storing carbs (kinda like livers). Underground to make them harder to eat.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Speculative: among animals, predators might actually be more edible than prey, overall. Prey have more incentives to be less edible (leads to shells, poison, etc), and predators don't have to worry as much about this.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Confusing (to me): grains (wheat, rice, corn, etc). Glancing at the Wikipedia articles, their wild ancestors spread by wind. So not optimized to be eaten! (Although still seeds / fruits.) Then why so dominant as food crops? Do they just grow fast or something?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
Grow fast sounds right to me. Grasses are really quick growers.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Found an article with calories per acre numbers for various crops (but confused why it isn't calories per acre per year):https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/in-defense-of-corn-the-worlds-most-important-food-crop/2015/07/12/78d86530-25a8-11e5-b77f-eb13a215f593_story.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.