QC

Narratives are mostly the only way we transfer real information to each other as humans, with the rare exception of people who have enough STEM background / IQ / whatever else it is to actually use e.g. logical argument. Narrative is primal / natural.

At the narrative level, climate change has been swallowed up and irradiated by the culture wars (as have many other topics). Hard to talk about with most people without triggering all of the associated culture war stuff.

In line with this tweet, mostly arguments about climate change are not about climate change, they're about fighting the culture wars, which bottoms out into something like identity / tribe / belonging feeling under threat:https://twitter.com/QiaochuYuan/status/1116428073757396992 …

One of the traditional tactics, of trying to get people outraged about the environment, has stopped working because the outrage market has been saturated by the culture wars. Everyone has more than enough stuff to be outraged about now. Need something else.

At the epistemic level, science as a cultural process has been showing serious cracks for awhile (reproducibility crisis, p-hacking, etc). There's a genuine question of how trustworthy it is, and that question is genuinely scary in the aftermath of the death of God.

Because if we can't trust science or God to tell us what's true, then what can we trust? One of the big questions we need to hold globally. No easy answers, and lots of people are clinging onto or grasping for easy answers.