We can use words to point to the way out of words, into everything else. Rumi remix: out beyond ideas, there is a field. I'll meet you there?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
Are you pessimistic about neuroscience being able to do this definitively in some eventual future? i.e., it giving us a recipe for guaranteeing that when I “say” “Concept”, we can both know that you’re grokking the same thing I am?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bucketofkets
It's not even clear to me that "you're grokking the same thing I am" is a meaningful thing to ask for.
@Meaningness' Parable of the Pebbles (https://meaningness.com/eggplant/pebbles …) might be good to read in connection with this.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QiaochuYuan @Meaningness
(I have read it, and generally agree with the thrust), we might be talking past each other with different definitions of “same”. If I say “capitalism”, this necessarily ignites some constellation of neurons in your mind, informed by things you read, stories you’ve heard,etc ...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bucketofkets @QiaochuYuan
...and this pattern is structurally (syntactically) different than the pattern that fires when I say “puppy”. I don’t think it’s meaningless to ask “can I make the pattern of neurons that fires in your brain when I say ‘puppy’ look most similar to mine?”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bucketofkets
That's a meaningful question, but I think it's a very different question from the one I think you're actually interested in. "Similar" patterns of neuron firing in our brain might code for very different concepts, due to plasticity and whatever else.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
I mean, it depends on how you define “similar”. If “similar” means “feels the same from the inside”, then that’s exactly the question I want to ask. Literally looking the same only works if we have identical brains :P
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bucketofkets
I still think it's really tricky to nail down what "feels the same" means. Maybe you love puppies and I hate them. That'll probably show up in neural activation. Do we have the "same" concept of puppies then?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
Probably not! Depends on how much we’d like to confabulate “what I feel about puppies” and “the Concept of puppies”. There’s probably more common ground in the latter than the former, but even being able to reason/say concrete things like “my feeling for puppies...”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bucketofkets @QiaochuYuan
“...most closely matches for your feelings for an admixture of purple, bunnies, and lettuce” would go a great ways towards disambiguating the vagueness of “from the inside” experience
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So, my real point, which I've been making poorly, is that the question of how "similar" our concept of puppies is doesn't ground out into a question of what's happening in our heads. My puppy concept is about how I interact with the world - e.g. with the puppies in it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.