Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
I have a HUGE amount of respect for book reviewers and bloggers. But... What the hell? What the ever-loving hell? Just read the first line of this review and tell me how fast you slammed your head against the wall. Go on. I'll wait.pic.twitter.com/AWbU3B8364
The rest of the review doesn't matter. Nope. Not even worth quoting anything from it. This is like leaping into The Two Towers without reading Fellowship and wondering who the hell this Boromir fellow is they keep talking about and what's this about a ring?
Also, hey! I didn't expect this to blow up like it did but SINCE IT DID you can pick up BOOK ONE (that would be the first book, *ahem*) in @k_villoso's Chronicles of the Bitch Queen series and it is ON SALE right now so go! https://www.amazon.com/Wolf-Oren-Yaro-Chronicles-Bitch-Queen-ebook/dp/B07QHSNYLF …
And again!
Would you like a chance to win the entire Chronicles of the Bitch Queen series? @gwendamned is holding a giveaway for all three books (including a pre-order of Book Three!)https://twitter.com/gwendamned/status/1359610233954312192 …
& RT to enter! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B084VJZGQ7?ref_=dbs_p_mng_rwt_ser_shvlr&storeType=ebooks … pic.twitter.com/dDV5bOQkgrUh. Yeah, that review is officially more worthless than GameStop stock before Reddit got a hold of it. (Oooh, topical.)
I would say as a blogger this is unethical for us. This is just an asshole.
This looks like a publication review.....whoa.
*ahem*... it's Locus.
I've been reading books out of order all my life because that's how I found them in shops & libraries. As such, I've got to disagree with the idea a book can only be reviewed if read in the order the author intended because that's not everyone's reading experience.
A book should be able to stand on its own because that's how some people find them. A major publication should probably be sourcing reviewers who've read the first, but I don't think it's fair to say the opinions of reviewers who've not read the whole thing are invalid.
This made me so. mad.
And I'm not even getting into other Not Great things in the review. Just that alone.... argh, I need more chocolate.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
