Progressivism moves to embrace the repeal if the 1st Amendment.
-
-
-
No, "company stops user using its service after he violates terms he agreed to when signing up".
-
I totally agree, and if any of u don't understand this please go read your agreement
-
It's a private company, so it has the right, I didn't say otherwise. But, it's a very slippery slope.
-
It's for them to deal with that slope, but in this instance I'm pleased.
-
The solution to unpopular speech is more speech. When we first move to censor, we all lose.
-
Again, not censoring, banning from a service. He can post his views elsewhere.
-
The problem with your point is that
@jack and company have constantly shown their progressive proclivities.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, it proves that liberal fascism is intolerant of views it doesn't agree with. It's what makes you Nazis.
-
Yeah, nazis who stop someone using a service after they breach the terms and conditions they agreed to in order to use it.
-
Glad to see you can rationalize your ignorance.
#YouAreANazi -
Glad to see you clearly don't know what the term Nazi means...
-
Having had family as guests of the Nazis, most did not survive, I do. Liberalism is fascism with a fake sauce of democracy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting interpretation of a human right. Is there anything that would be unjustified to do to "a human turd"?
-
Which human right is that? Violating terms and conditions that you've agreed to?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you and Putin would make a great couple, homophobe
-
And why am I a homophobe?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
It doesn't mean I want to swim in turd-infested waters, and if people RT (to continue the analogy) the turd can end up in my eyes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.