Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @PubPeer
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @PubPeer
-
Prikvačeni tweet
We now have a
@zotero extension that indicates which articles in your Zotero library have PubPeer comments. You can find it here. https://github.com/PubPeerFoundation/pubpeer_zotero_plugin … We're interested in any feedback!Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Obviously, more than a few people have asked me about the present dust-up in ecology right now. By purest good fortune, I have already written my opinion down. 18 months ago. On the 'bad apples in research' argument. This one feels a bit eerie.pic.twitter.com/AZCLm3snum
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Alright. Inspired by this tweet, I decided to read all relevant
#Coronavirus preprints (about 30 in all). Here's what I've found, a thread. 1/15https://twitter.com/ryneches/status/1223439143503482880 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
And as Nick points out the one in a journal hasn'thttps://twitter.com/pathogenomenick/status/1224429764410253319 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
The retraction happened before a single news outlet with any reach covered the paper, as best we can tell. But none of it was quite fast enough for some critics.https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/03/retraction-faulty-coronavirus-paper-good-moment-for-science/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Reading the comments on
@pubpeer re:#Pruittdata. Truly fascinating. People debating over whether 1 spider can be touching 9 other spiders in 3d webs. Lots of modeling & graphs & ppl making spiders out of pipe cleaners to elucidate points. Riveting. https://pubpeer.com/publications/9BBCDE0A1E31EC56052A8C2937EE8E …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
If anyone wants to see some scientists joyfully demolishing Exley do pop over to PubPeer (
@PubPeer ): https://blog.pubpeer.com/publications/0817BE6ED4DE965DA93EF93BB7FCA5 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Don't understand either. Within hours flaws were identified in this preprint + comments. In my view peer review has worked well & this is how it should be. Although it would be great to better inform the public when a preprint is retracted. I think this is lacking for Biorxiv
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Let's talk about Hyrum's Law and what it means for
@biorxivpreprint screening standards. cc@hyrumwrighthttps://twitter.com/michaelhoffman/status/1194048160991191040 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
I don’t understand the attack on preprints (because of the “virus is engineered” MS). *Owing* to the preprint the problems were identified & it didn’t reach the public. Someone forgot that “vaccines cause autism” was published in the Lancet? (Retracted after many years of damage)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
I have to debunk this conspiracy theory because it is truly insane! So the claim is Scientists at Whuan have
#CRISPR their CCR5 gene to immunize themselves against#nCoV2019, which serves as a bioweapon but failed to properly edit CCR5. This doesn't make any sense or whatsoever.https://twitter.com/LokiJulianus/status/1221241173949456387 …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
I'd say that may for-money journals are being willingly spammed with crap, and then spamming us. In the end, if you are happy with them and unhappy with preprints and PubPeer, the solution for you seems obvious.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
As a frequent commenter on
@PubPeer (n=1800), both under my full name or anonymous in cases of litigious authors, I disagree. And I agree with many PubPeer posts about serious concerns about images, author affiliations, selective data picking, or conflicts of interest.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
I've checked it because this claim that HIV inserts in
#nCoV2019 & not fortuitous is insane. So I aligned the sequences & those inserts are real. However I've blast those peptides & founds > 100 hits from various organisms. In my view#nCoV2019 - HIV link not ascertained. https://twitter.com/ARanganathan72/status/1223320879162986496 …Tweet je nedostupan.Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU DON’T TRUST YOUR DATA ANYMORE https://laskowskilab.faculty.ucdavis.edu/2020/01/29/retractions/ … see also: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/01/29/authors-questioning-papers-at-nearly-two-dozen-journals-in-wake-of-spider-paper-retraction/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
I can only assume every clever method developed to detect fake results becomes a unit test added to the fraudstr package that some determined cheat somewhere has written.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Statement regarding recent retractions. https://ambikamath.wordpress.com/2020/01/29/statement-regarding-recent-retractions/ … via
@wordpressdotcomHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
This paper has just been published on Biorxiv. I would be extremely interested in seeing comment from others working on 2019-nCoV sequencing, because its claims are. . .unusual, to say the least. But presented with data:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
You can now save a search in PubPeer and receive email alerts for new comment that match the search pattern.pic.twitter.com/GXgPh59uba
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
PubPeer proslijedio/la je Tweet
Latest Talking Tatas blog post -
@PubPeer, Fact-checking, and How to (and NOT to) handle mistakes in published scientific literature.#science#ethics#integrityhttps://talkingtatas.com/2020/01/31/being-a-great-scientist-how-to-and-not-to-handle-mistakes/ …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.