He lost 400 subscribers. Why is that a big deal?
His associated isn’t new, but the running to the defence of him is. I can’t see his tweets anymore, obviously, but I’m pretty sure he said the link between them on the Reactionary Right web thing from a few months ago was based on little. But that was only 1 of 4 factors that...
-
-
I mentioned. And I didn’t say he was arrogant, I said the tweet was because it implied that the only reason his subs would go down would be because of a conspiracy. Not because inactive accounts are being removed as are not accounts. Which YouTube have been clear about...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
