Lee Jussim

@PsychRabble

Social science&science reform, viewpoint diversity, principled defense of free inquiry, disciplined skepticism.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @PsychRabble

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @PsychRabble

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    21. pro 2018.

    Political bias&distortions pervade social science. This manifests as hypocrisy, double standards & selective calls for rigor. Many academics are blind to those biases. They honestly deny them, making them hard for others to see. I hold them under a well-lit microscope. Also:

    Poništi
  2. prije 2 sata

    When not doing the head-in-the-air ivory tower thing, I have all sorts of tricks up my sleeve... It is weird that this works. But just a dash (1/4 to 1/2 shot, no more), gives the coffee a nice rich flavor.

    Poništi
  3. prije 4 sata

    Blancofemophobia: Prejudice against white women, as exemplified by dismissing the beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors of white women with phrases such as, “White women white womening." 1 of 's most hated tweets? (From The Orwelexicon)

    Poništi
  4. prije 4 sata

    Thanks, Jim! 1. If you embrace the TwHate, it can be fun! (ask ). See The Orwelexicon! 2. When are we gonna do that podcast?

    Poništi
  5. prije 15 sati

    ICYMI (sent this while most of you were prob in full Super Bowl prep mode). New additions: Cringecrickets, Dogmaflares, Bigotry Denialism, Hypocritical Theory, and Ovaryactions. Read on for definitions/explanations and more.

    Poništi
  6. prije 23 sata

    Flattery will get you anywhere you want to go.

    Poništi
  7. 2. velj

    If you would like me to add you to the acknowledgements (at the end of the Medium essay), also let me know. Happy to do so (if you are not already there). You can find the longer Medium list here (which includes several new ones not in this thread). End.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 2. velj

    Keep the suggestions coming! If you have one for potential addition, please use (its easy to lose them in the vastness of Twitter). Also, understand, I will feel free to use/modify anything you suggest.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 2. velj

    Perhaps my fav of the new additions: Hypocritical Theory: How Self-Proclaimed Moral Superiority Usurps Power, Corrodes Due Process, and and Crushes Universal Human Rights

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 2. velj

    What do you do, if, despite being a good, even radical, progressive, woke activist, or merely an academic, and you find yourself in dialogue with ... other types of people? You know how the woke work. Outrage mobs. Guilt-by-assocation. What can you do? Emit Dogmaflares!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 2. velj

    The newest addition, inspired by: Reviews of The Orwelexicon from The Wokest on and off Twitter: "Cringeworthy." "Cringe!" "I couldn't read it, it was pure cringe!"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 2. velj

    This is a modified version of a suggestion in the comments on the Q Orwelexicon. ht for flagging it. It uses rhetoric highly symmetrical to that used by those who claim is not a sexist epithet to explain why "overyaction" is not a sexist term either.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 2. velj

    New additions: Know how you keep hearing nonwhites can't be racist? Occasionally, that women can't be sexist? And attempts to stigmatize all sorts of views as "denialism"? I mean, denialism can be a real thing or a stigmatization attempt. Game On:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 2. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 2. velj

    Thread. Newest additions to The Orwelexicon. Short Original Version can be found here:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    Joanne has a new short blog on The Orwelexicon. To repeat: Its creation was a collaborative effort, its for everyone who wants to use it, and the terms are to be used freely (definitely not proprietary). Emotional imperialism is probably the most popular. And its bipartisan.

    Poništi
  17. 2. velj

    More on the animal bio fraud scandal: "If science is the 1st victim, scientists are the 2nd...The scientists who are hurt the most are those who were collaborators with Jonathan Pruitt...years of work go down the drain. They fear for their own reputation."

    Poništi
  18. 2. velj

    Because "Are there genetic bases for race diffs in intelligence" is so obviously not on the same planet as "Are there genetic differences b/w species" your acting like only an idiot would think "we haven't already answered the question" reflects poorly on you.

    Poništi
  19. 1. velj

    At UCBerkeley, Diversity Statements are being used for both ideological screening and de facto racial discrimination. Legal challenges on way. Maybe there is no such thing as "reverse" discrimination. But there is such a thing as "discrimination."

    Poništi
  20. 1. velj
    Poništi
  21. 31. sij

    How about a little civic fortitude? "The problem is not that the sacrificial victim is selected. The problem is that the people who destroy a reputation are permitted to do so by the complicity, silence & slinking away of everybody else." ht

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·