PsyArXiv

@PsyArXiv

A free preprint service for the psychological sciences. Find our blog @

Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @PsyArXiv

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @PsyArXiv

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    20. srp 2018.

    Exciting news! now supports commenting on all preprints (powered by )! PsyArXiv has been a place to share your work, but now you'll also be able to give/receive/solicit informal peer review.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. stu 2019.

    The preprint can be found on below. Also, all the data and analysis code (in ) for all studies is available on the OSF.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. stu 2019.

    New preprint : Reports from Twin Earth. We test semantic externalism vs. internalism in 3 exp, and conclude that neither deep structure nor appearance is alone sufficient for membership in natural category.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Really excited to share my first on : “Comparing unfamiliar voice and face identity perception using identity sorting tasks” with and . . Available at Thread 1/7

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. stu 2019.

    Delighted to share our (and my first) preprint "Psychometric properties of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory in Alzheimer’s disease: A review:" on : We review the psychometric properties of NPI, and suggest some options for future research.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. stu 2019.

    Choices between safe and risky policy proposals were biased by both frame (gain vs. loss) and partisanship (whether the policy has Republicans', Democrats', or bipartisan support). From on :

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. stu 2019.

    New on : a review of neuroimaging studies of resilience to trauma, including discussion of how we measure trauma and resilience in the lab, and the kind of data we will need in the future for this to be clinically useful (TLDR; reliable & complex)

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. stu 2019.

    New preprint by my colleagues and I on the relationship of Need for Cognition to executive functions where we only report Bayesian analyses! Looking forward to the reviewers' comments. ;-)

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. stu 2019.

    Our new paper on the conditions of living well is out on

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. stu 2019.

    New preprint: "How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements?" with and . Available on :

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. stu 2019.

    New preprint on ! , Marieke Timmerman and I investigated the bias-variance trade-off in continuous test norming using GAMLSS. What are the costs of having a too strict model compared to the costs of having a too flexible norming model?

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    7. stu 2019.

    1/ Here is a nice thing that happened. After the symposium I decided to go back and post all my published work on

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. stu 2019.

    Check out this important & relevant review in from by and : "Classification of Theory of Mind tasks and their computational models"! RL, (i)-POMDP, etc.!

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. stu 2019.

    Andreja Bubic, and me just published our first preprint on : "Who detects and why?" We investigate ind. diff. that underpin different approaches to solving CRT and belief bias syllogisms and how these relate to validity of the tasks.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. stu 2019.

    Now out in & Life-Threatening Behavior - -related differences in the experience of negative and positive Uses / clips to induce sadness/amusement. Accepted version

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. stu 2019.

    Almost forgot to upload our (work with Veronika Lerche, Friederike Köhler and Andreas Voss) latest preprint on : What do you (think you) need? Perceived vs. observed effects of need fulfillment on well-being

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. stu 2019.

    New from & examines how identity formation may moderate the effect between early life adversity & psychopathology. Preprint from available here:

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. lis 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. lis 2019.

    This is my first preprint on : »Using anticlustering to partition a stimulus pool into equivalent parts«. We discuss anticlustering that can be used to allocate stimuli to experimental sets in psychological research - when sets should ideally be as similar as possible.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Peterson et al. dichotomize their sample into ↑ vs ↓ PsyCap. But the method is unclear. Could be the mean, median, cutpoints from past lit, or testing all quantiles & choosing that with the smallest p val in an α-level test. More in

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. lis 2019.

    My first ever pre-print is now available at . This work marks the beginning of a series of experiments I've conducted with and Janet Tomiyama () that explore memory for eating behaviors.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·