Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Protohedgehog

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Protohedgehog

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    New book published: The [R]evolution of Open Science

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. "Our project is illegal, but it’s the right thing to do in this crisis. We refuse to put copyright before human lives." People are using to freely but illicitly share more than 5,000 scientific articles on the

    Poništi
  3. Poništi
  4. I am aware of the public comments that Chealsye Bowley () is making about me. I am pursuing legal action against these harmful claims and the person who is making them. They are entirely false, and I have substantial evidence to support this.

    Poništi
  5. Very happy that our article, Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing, was by FAR the most popular article published in Publications in 2019. Congrats and thanks to all co-authors for helping to produce such a useful piece of work!

    Poništi
  6. We owe it to ourselves and to society to be emotionally and intellectually exceptional. Why would we each want to be anything less than our absolute best? Just because we are posting online, does not absolve us from the responsibility of thinking before we speak.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. The power of words comes from their precision. Shouting louder and angrier is not a suitable replacement for the truth, but is something social media seems to be conditioning people to more and more.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. Every time these words get carelessly flung around, they desensitise people to real victims and legitimate problems. They foster a culture of hostility, when what the world needs more than ever right now is more compassion.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. I'm not tweeting much these days, but this is important. Just because you don't like something, that does not make it 'abuse'. Just because someone disagrees with you, that does not make it 'harassment'. Just because you disagree with someone, that does not make them 'toxic'.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. Open Science saves lives: Scientists are unraveling the Chinese coronavirus with unprecedented speed and openness

    Poništi
  11. Modern academic culture is toxic and is destroying the minds of our best. This survey on in researchers will be important in promoting a healthier, more compassionate and supportive culture.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Epic cover design courtesy of Elena Frigerio:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. Poništi
  14. This checklist is not designed as a replacement for peer review, or for critical thinking and the application of wider forms of expertise. Nor do we make recommendations about how researchers should subjectively assess the 'impact' or 'quality' of a study.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. Its effectiveness will be realised when it is up-taken by palaeontology journals, who can integrate these guidelines into their reviewer policies as part of ensuring that they are facilitating peer review to a sufficient quality standard.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. The aim of this project is to formulate a clear set of guidelines for reviewers in palaeontology journals. Through this, peer review can be more transparent and objective, representing a valid form of peer review best practice and part of responsible research conduct.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. It is our duty as scholars to be critical of all elements of knowledge production, and if peer review is to be considered to be any sort of test of integrity or validation, then we must improve it.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. Despite being widely criticised, it remains almost ubiquitous in scholarly communication systems. At the present, because we typically have almost no understanding of what peer review actually does, even generally, it can only be considered a 'pseudo-standard' at best.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. However, not only is peer review non-standardised, it also fails most basic tests of academic credibility and objectivity by being secretive, exclusive, and irreproducible. The process is often opaque, which can introduce bias into reporting standards for research.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. Preprint at : Thread: That peer review operates as a 'gold standard' for scholarly research has become a common, institutionalised mantra. It is widely considered to be fundamental in maintaining the rigour and validity of scholarly research.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. Just finished a first-draft on a new paper, "Standardising Peer Review in Paleontology journals." Feedback at this stage very much welcomed, as I have undoubtedly missed quite a bit!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·