"Meaning" is a meaningless concept cause there's no example of something without it. It's literally the dog-head from the pasta graveyard.
-
-
Replying to @ericlinuskaplan
@ericlinuskaplan@GenitiveOfOf I forget which of you is more constructivist, but cc@ProofOfLogic@ValueOfType6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @laMudri
@laMudri@GenitiveOfOf@ProofOfLogic@ValueOfType what does "constructivist" mean in this context?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericlinuskaplan
@ericlinuskaplan@laMudri The rejection of proof by contradiction, & of ∞. Perhaps@ProofOfLogic or@ValueOfType will see the relevance.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GenitiveOfOf
@GenitiveOfOf@laMudri@ProofOfLogic@ValueOfType if constructivists (or Platonists) were right, how would we know?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @ericlinuskaplan
@ericlinuskaplan@laMudri@ProofOfLogic@ValueOfType If we found an infinity, that would disprove constructivism.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GenitiveOfOf
@GenitiveOfOf@laMudri@ProofOfLogic@ValueOfType would we know it when we found it?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ericlinuskaplan @GenitiveOfOf @laMudri @ValueOfType If we knew it when we found it, *that's * what would disprove constructivism, I think.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.