A universe with no big bang (a steady-state) still seems elegant, but now it's become inconceivable for reasons *unrelated* to gravity.
-
-
Replying to @ProofOfLogic
@ProofOfLogic what are the reasons? thermodynamics?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit I overstated the case with "inconceivable", of course.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProofOfLogic
@ProofOfLogic it's one of those words that don't mean what people think they mean1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit ♪imagine no beginning, is easy if you try, no big bang before us, ahead only sky ♪2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ProofOfLogic
@VesselOfSpirit This would also make the Fermi paradox worse.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProofOfLogic
@ProofOfLogic reverse "fermi" and you get "i'm ref". coincidence?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit What's a coincidence really, but an apparent regularity which is of no use to our broader knowledge?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProofOfLogic
@ProofOfLogic what is a coincidence? a miserable little pile of improbabilities!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@VesselOfSpirit The implied comma was "no no, more meta", not "no, no more meta" fyi
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.