Not id'ing anything in yr character. Looking at yr article's language, Professor. Yr last 3 para's are completely ourobouros.
Curious how people routinely attribute legal disagreement to some character flaw on the part of others. No point debating it.https://twitter.com/protanope/status/804069897609220096 …
-
-
-
You say I "seem terrified." No I don't. I disagree with you, that's all. That is a character attack.
@protanope -
U seem very defensive. I've told you it's not an attack. I just don't understand how u get from "they're free" to "don't act free"
-
U say "I’ve been present when electoral candidates were selected" & then backdate that to 1787, as if u knew what intentions were.
-
"Wisdom is seldom sought after, and would be pretty much useless." Useless to who? How about we just focus on constitutionality?!
-
There appears 2b some hidden reason why u r arguing that way (as ALL writers do). Not an attack. An affirmation of common humanity
-
Even w/length of ur piece, not enough to get inside yr head. There appears 2b something behind the scenes that is not logic alone
-
Anyway, though I'd try 2 name that hidden motivation as "fear". But I guess U really don't like others trying to impute feelings.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.