"Libel-proof" is a real thing, though. When you got nothin' you got nothin' to damage.https://twitter.com/AriMelber/status/786671323439304704 …
-
-
Replying to @Profepps
The Times itself reported this harms him w/ voters. If he had no reputation to damage, it wouldn't affect the polls.
@Profepps@AriMelberpic.twitter.com/nr5LdoYpgP
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @kevenogh
Many many things "affect the polls" and "harm" candidates with voters that are not defamatory. @MarcusEpstein
@AriMelber1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps @AriMelber
I'm not saying it's defamatory. But if they more than nominally damage Trump's reputation, he's not libel proof.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kevenogh
.@MarcusEpstein
@AriMelber Voter support & compensable reputation clearly not the same thing or HRC could sue for his saying she likes TPP.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Profepps @AriMelber
If people aren't voting for Trump b/c they think he's a rapist, that's evidence that it harms his reputation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think Trump has real difficulty proving malice, & hard to prove a he said she said allegation is false
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Plus which it's a badass way to answer a demand letter. @MarcusEpstein @AriMelber
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.