Yes, he will. But the firm itself wasn't very diversified. Getting folded into a big law firm will fix that.
-
-
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq @sbagen
marquee constitutional cases likely aren't big moneymakers anyways. there still be big biz scotus cases no matter what
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
But why fold into a big law firm? And why now? Is there something more Occam-y?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq @sbagen
I assume because Kirkland put a lot of $ on the table. They can overpay as a loss-leader for the prestige gains
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
definitely more Occam-y. But were they on the market in the first place? If so, why? Paging
@kpolantz to set me straight.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Paul C worked at Kirkland previously; I doubt they were out shopping more broadly
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @danepps
Sometimes big firms walk in with money. @danepps @MikeSacksEsq @sbagen @kpolantz
11:51 AM - 12 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.