This piece on Facebook threats case by @Profepps gets it exactly right. Much ado about nothing: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/does-a-true-threat-require-a-guilty-mind/394643/ …
-
-
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall did you read his art. leading up to oral? Prof. Epps got the prediction completely wrong. Why congrat a hindsight article.?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rlhall120
@rlhall120@espinsegall no idea what you're talking about. no prediction in my preview article. & why is it bad if Erich likes this piece?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@espinsegall didn't say anything "bad" in liking it, but Court did not follow your "threat" view, it's about the sender not rec.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rlhall120
@rlhall120@espinsegall I did not make a prediction so I'm mystified what you're talking about. Enough said on this, just puzzled.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
Maybe you're talking to me. I made no prediction but do think an objective test when it comes to true threats is ok. RT
@Profepps@rlhall1202 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall wasn't talking about objective test issue. I felt your original tweet was sycophantic. That is what I tweeted to you about.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rlhall120 @espinsegall "sycophantic"?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.