This piece on Facebook threats case by @Profepps gets it exactly right. Much ado about nothing: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/does-a-true-threat-require-a-guilty-mind/394643/ …
@rlhall120 @espinsegall no idea what you're talking about. no prediction in my preview article. & why is it bad if Erich likes this piece?
-
-
@Profepps@espinsegall didn't say anything "bad" in liking it, but Court did not follow your "threat" view, it's about the sender not rec. -
@rlhall120@espinsegall I did not make a prediction so I'm mystified what you're talking about. Enough said on this, just puzzled. -
Maybe you're talking to me. I made no prediction but do think an objective test when it comes to true threats is ok. RT
@Profepps@rlhall120 -
@espinsegall@rlhall120 Neither of us made a prediction so this exchange has mystified me. -
I've been called a lot of names, but never that. RT
@Profepps@rlhall120 -
@espinsegall@rlhall120 certainly not to me! (Your usual message to me is "Wrong again, Epps!") :D
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.