.@Profepps on Rauner's unilateral refusal to collect union fees: "executive overreach..is in the eye of the beholder"http://theatln.tc/1KK0TlD
-
-
Replying to @CharlotteGarden
@CharlotteGarden@Profepps does this compare to "signing statements" by Presidents to not enforce law due to belief of unconstitutionality?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rlhall120
@rlhall120@Profepps Here, the obligation to require the fees is contractual, so there's no question of exec. enforcement discretion1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @CharlotteGarden
.@CharlotteGarden @rlhall120 just so. Contracts with workers are different from "real" contracts with,say, equity firms, apparently.
11:14 AM - 14 May 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.