"Panel Objects to Hobby Lobby Ruling": The Harvard Crimson has an article that begins, "Panelists raised concerns… http://dlvr.it/9kzFtd
@FedSocLawProf @howappealing The video of the conference will be up soon--would it be in some way bad to wait to watch it before going bats?
-
-
@Profepps@howappealing I look forward 2 the video. Let's see the entire panel in context. I certainly won't go bats no matter how bad it is -
.
@FedSocLawProf@howappealing@JoshMBlackman If she said something dumb then have at it. But I'm former editor of CRIMSON: trust but verify. -
@Profepps@howappealing@JoshMBlackman I can't wait for an unedited video of Dean Minow's remarks at panel discussion to be released. -
@FedSocLawProf@howappealing@JoshMBlackman the old news-biz saying was, "too good to fact-check," right? -
@Profepps@howappealing@JoshMBlackman The good news is the Twitter controversy caused the Crimson to correct their story. All good. -
.
@FedSocLawProf@howappealing@JoshMBlackman yes correction is good for the soul. Journalistic soul at least.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.