@tommybuck a point irrelevant to the point at hand, since the claim was about the facts of this case, not about all societies over time.
-
-
@Profepps Plus, if Court decides on animus grounds, and common law had no animus, wouldn't common law man-woman def. still apply? -
@tommybuck I'm not aware of any principle that "animus" however defined is the only reason discrimination is invidious. -
@Profepps So why should we assume the worst about the MI voter without more evidence of their motivations? -
@tommybuck no mental inquiry needed: prop 2 itself banned#ssm AND civil unions. Why if no "animus"?Certly discrimination. Plato? Who cares?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Profepps (2/2) If arguing animus, burden should be on petition to actually show there was animus.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Profepps Would agree except pets did not provide evidence why MI voters had more malicious reasons than ancient cultures - (1/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.