Why would it be "fair" not to consult social science in the #SSM case? Is the aim to be "fair" or right?
@JoeDunman It is relevant indeed to the question of the effect on children, I think.
-
-
@Profepps Only if effect on children is a relevant constitutional question, which they could easily reject/dodge. Kennedy def. cares, though -
@JoeDunman yes, but your statement was that it is "only" relevant to suspect classification issue, and actually it is also relevant to this. -
@Profepps Only was too strong, yes. We know Justice Kennedy cares a lot about the kids, so whatever standard he applies will consider it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.