@Profepps why not note in your piece that majority of federal circuits that have considered the issue allow RFRA defenses in private suits?
-
-
Replying to @cdbradley2
@cdbradley2 a) not sure it's true& b not relevant to fWORDING of Indiana stat, Fed RFRA doesn't address this; IN RFRA does, as I said.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cdbradley2
@cdbradley2 I stated correctly that RFRA & IN RFRA had different wording. That some courts read one in a given way is a different question.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cdbradley2
@cdbradley2 I don't think an unambiguous statute "codifies" an ambiguous one. The federal issue isn't settled. You're quibbling.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @cdbradley2
@cdbradley2 why, it's you. I discussed the wording of the statute; I'm correct so you've changed the subject.
7:25 PM - 31 Mar 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.