@anamariecox It's not exactly, but it's also not the departure he suggests: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416160/indiana-protecting-discrimination-josh-blackman …
-
-
Replying to @DouthatNYT
@anamariecox@Profepps didn't respond to analysis by Stanford & UVA Law profs on points about for-profits and private lawsuits.@DouthatNYT2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McCormackJohn
@McCormackJohn@anamariecox@DouthatNYT nope I responded to YOUR false statement that "everyone always" thought RFRA applied to corps2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @McCormackJohn
@McCormackJohn agajn you suggested no one disagreed with them. Simply false. And you're evading that u changing the issue.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McCormackJohn
@McCormackJohn I think you missed your readers. You should correct. For shame.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McCormackJohn
@McCormackJohn my piece was correct. Yours was AT BEST confused. Are you a lawyer by training, btw?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@McCormackJohn I thought not. Cheers to you. Bye.
-
-
Replying to @Profepps
John McCormack Retweeted John McCormack
@Profepps You don't care to answer this question?https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/582566163076497409 …John McCormack added,
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.