@Profepps @RTDSchapiro @KenCuccinelli Disagree. This is American constitutionalism in its highest form. People over document, and Court.
.@kurtlash1 @rlhall120 @RTDSchapiro @KenCuccinelli Yes,I think Article III courts would stand clear. Scenario eerily resembles 1787, nu?
-
-
@Profepps@rlhall120@RTDSchapiro@KenCuccinelli Yes. Also 1866 with Pres. Johnson claiming rump Cong. had no legit. power to propose 14thA -
@kurtlash1@rlhall120@RTDSchapiro@KenCuccinelli Rumors he would convene "true Congress," or break up sitting one with troops. Wot larks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Profepps@kurtlash1@RTDSchapiro@KenCuccinelli academic anyway, will never be Const. convention under this Const. (1787 does not apply)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Profepps@kurtlash1@RTDSchapiro@KenCuccinelli other than civil war, or political compromise, who else but SCOTUS to rule correct route?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.