@AdamSerwer @Popehat one-half of one percent? Nada, zip, zilch? A shift I ethos from my day.
-
-
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@AdamSerwer So it's your position that parody and satire are morally blameworthy when well executed? Jonathan Swift was a bad man?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Popehat
@Profepps@AdamSerwer Editorial: We of The Times strongly condemn this barbaric call for the eating of Irish babies!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Popehat
@Popehat@AdamSerwer Swift signed his own name to PROPOSAL.pic.twitter.com/f06AtwnKb0
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@AdamSerwer Ah, I see. Do you believe that a parody of North Korean news under the name "Patrick at Popehat" would be effective?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Popehat
.
@Popehat@AdamSerwer misrepresentation is often more effective than truth. That fact at best morally neutral.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@AdamSerwer Agreed. But effective satire is impossible without misrepresentation. I am not a journalist.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Popehat
.
@Popehat@AdamSerwer I disagree with your premise. But go with God, we have exhausted this topic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@AdamSerwer Indeed. Best wishes for whatever holiday you celebrate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Popehat @AdamSerwer Dude, I celebrate 'em all! And you too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.