Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Profepps's profile
Prof. Garrett Epps
Prof. Garrett Epps
Prof. Garrett Epps
@Profepps

Tweets

Prof. Garrett Epps

@Profepps

SCOTUS Correspondent, http://theatlantic.com , Prof., U. of Baltimore School of Law. Novel: THE SHAD TREATMENT. I don't answer eggs or FSB contractors.

Washington, DC
Joined April 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      I find it stunning that a self-professed con law nerd thinks that congress and the Pres wouldn't disagree @Profepps

      1 reply 4 retweets 0 likes
    2. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      The fact the Const allows for overriding vetoes and even impeachment, suggests the founders anticipated disagreement, no? @Profepps

      2 replies 4 retweets 2 likes
    3. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      Indeed the origination clause suggests the founders anticipated disagreement w/in congress @Profepps

      1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
    4. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      I don't know how anyone claiming knowledge of the const could say the founders did not dissipate disagreement between the branches @Profepps

      2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
    5. Prof. Garrett Epps‏ @Profepps 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      @AaronWorthing "I find it stunning" trope is condescension, not argument;you have of course misstated argument. Not stunning, happens a lot.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @Profepps

      And I am sorry if I come off as condescending but you're acting like checks & balances aren't a thing @Profepps

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Prof. Garrett Epps‏ @Profepps 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      .@AaronWorthing Well, sir, if you care, you didn't "come off" as condescending. You were condescending, and without proving any warrant.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @Profepps

      You said the founders did not anticipate any division in government. That is stunningly ignorant, esp for a law professor @Profepps

      2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    9. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      Now, do you want to talk about my attitude? Or do you want to prove me wrong? @Profepps

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Darth_Spurious‏ @Darth_Spurious 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @AaronWorthing

      @AaronWorthing @Profepps Well, Prof., it sure didn't take long until two PARTIES did emerge--with two FF's: Demo-Republ. vs. Federalist.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Prof. Garrett Epps‏ @Profepps 18 Nov 2014
      Replying to @Darth_Spurious

      @bbenamati Yes, and if you want proof they didn't see parties coming, check out Article II and the electoral system.

      2:17 PM - 18 Nov 2014
      5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Darth_Spurious‏ @Darth_Spurious 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Profepps

          @Profepps Anyway, twitter sucks as the medium to have this debate. So probably have to leave it at that

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Prof. Garrett Epps‏ @Profepps 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Darth_Spurious

          .@bbenamati Yes, my friend, Twitter relentlessly pushes interesting debates into shouting matches. My best to you and yours.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Darth_Spurious‏ @Darth_Spurious 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Profepps

          @Profepps Likewise. I'm sure we could have a rousing debate.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Prof. Garrett Epps‏ @Profepps 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Darth_Spurious

          .@bbenamati Yes, you seem to have a good deal of knowledge of the early Republic. A fun subject to discuss.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Darth_Spurious‏ @Darth_Spurious 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Profepps

          @Profepps I find that still a stretch considering the Washington-Clinton election established two clear parties-w/o ever being 'rectified'

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Prof. Garrett Epps‏ @Profepps 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Darth_Spurious

          @bbenamati The two parties emerged by 1796, and were full-grown by 1800,

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. heymikey80‏ @heymikey80 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Profepps

          If you want proof that they did see parties already extant, see Federalist 10. First paragraph. @profepps @bbenamati @AaronWorthing

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @heymikey80

          They said faction was inevitable and any cute to faction would be worse than the disease @heymikey80 @Profepps @bbenamati

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. heymikey80‏ @heymikey80 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @AaronWorthing

          Yes, and in 1st para Federalist 10 Madison actually called some factions parties, majority & minority. @aaronworthing @bbenamati @profepps

          1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
        5. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @heymikey80

          Ahahahahahaha! He blocked me! @heymikey80 @bbenamati @Profeppspic.twitter.com/ZSYmvJuIBK

          4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
        6. JR Byrd‏ @jrb802 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @AaronWorthing

          @AaronWorthing @heymikey80 @bbenamati @Profepps the more 'cons law profs' talk, the more I relize they have 0 idea wtf they r talking about

          0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
        7. End of conversation
        1. (((Keith)))‏ @kkaplan 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Profepps

          @Profepps @bbenamati they made the Sen tie breaker the 1st loser for president - most likely opposite viewpoint, no? Although 12A came quick

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. (((Aaron Worthing)))‏ @AaronWorthing 18 Nov 2014
          Replying to @Profepps

          What of impeachment, then? RT @Profepps: @bbenamati check out Article II and the electoral system.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info