@espinsegall wish I could read it! #paywall
@espinsegall He has ethical duty to defend unless no GF arguments, in which case defending would be unethical.
-
-
@Profepps There we must agree to disagree. Not issue of good faith but issue of does he think law violates US Constitution. 6 AG's said yes.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Profepps An AG in the South in 1958 would not have had to defend segregated facilities that technically no SCOTUS case applied to. -
@espinsegall If so, would six other AGs agreement to defend have been binding? -
@Profepps not saying anything is binding--saying AG would do right by the law, the people, the state, and the Constitution not to defend.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.