New parlor game. Name a Supreme Court case in which constitutional history was determinative.
-
-
Replying to @barryfriedman1
.
@barryfriedman1 do you mean WAS determinative or was CLAIMED BY THE JUSTICES to be determinative?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
.
@barryfriedman1 Different: Breyer J said in NOEL CANNING arg he couldn't find history supporting recess appointment as tool of executive.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @barryfriedman1
.
@barryfriedman1 has anyone in our lifetimes said anything new about the reason why the Constitution is binding?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@barryfriedman1 Nothing much new since Article VI. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1227162 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @crgreen24601
.
@crgreen24601@barryfriedman1 Let's say, "it's the CONSTITUTION!" Better than pretense Founders had some "democratic credentials"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@barryfriedman1 I'd instead emphasize the THIS and the BOUND.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
.@crgreen24601 @barryfriedman1 as a dad I'm comfortable with "I'm the Daddy!" It's probably the truest thing i ever told my kids.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.