New parlor game. Name a Supreme Court case in which constitutional history was determinative.
.@barryfriedman1 has anyone in our lifetimes said anything new about the reason why the Constitution is binding?
-
-
@Profepps Even if they have it gets more and more remote from how we actually govern ourselves. Almost an inverse relationship at times.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Profepps@barryfriedman1 Nothing much new since Article VI. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1227162 … -
.
@crgreen24601@barryfriedman1 Let's say, "it's the CONSTITUTION!" Better than pretense Founders had some "democratic credentials" -
@Profepps@barryfriedman1 I'd instead emphasize the THIS and the BOUND. -
.
@crgreen24601@barryfriedman1 But the words can't justify anything just by their utterance. -
@Profepps At least honesty by Paulsen. With originalism away goes stare decisis. -
.
@barryfriedman1 Yes! Not faint-hearted, he!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.