Great piece on the arrogance of the Roberts Court and judicial hubris by @profepps http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/11/in-john-roberts-s-world-only-the-court-can-be-trusted/281340/ …
-
-
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall@kkaplan@Profepps John Roberts decided he wanted to make law, when he voted for Obama Care. His arrogance goes w/o question.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kathrynv904
@Kathrynv904@espinsegall@Profepps I saw that as wanting to avoid another Bush v Gore. He just needed a way to do it w/out expanding CC arg1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kkaplan
@kkaplan@Kathrynv904@espinsegall Obamacare not the problem. He "made law" only with his crazy commerce doctrine. SHELBY Co is problem.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@Kathrynv904@espinsegall the vote was a sham -if they can't come up with a bipartisan formula after voting 98-0, were they wrong?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kkaplan
@kkaplan@Kathrynv904@espinsegall The Court's authority to demand a new formula when the old one worked fine? It's right here: ________.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@Kathrynv904@espinsegall if one of these is better, why apply a 50 yr old formula that's out of date? http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/23/us/voting-rights-act-map.html?_r=0 …2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @kkaplan
They found old formula was still needed based on new info. Roberts got this all wrong. 100 percent false.
@kkaplan@Profepps@Kathrynv9042 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall@Profepps@Kathrynv904 If Congress thought that, they'd vote a bi-partisan formula today. They were kicking can down the road2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.