@Kathrynv904 @espinsegall @Profepps I saw that as wanting to avoid another Bush v Gore. He just needed a way to do it w/out expanding CC arg
-
-
Replying to @kkaplan
@kkaplan@Kathrynv904@espinsegall Obamacare not the problem. He "made law" only with his crazy commerce doctrine. SHELBY Co is problem.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@Kathrynv904@espinsegall the vote was a sham -if they can't come up with a bipartisan formula after voting 98-0, were they wrong?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kkaplan
@kkaplan@Kathrynv904@espinsegall The Court's authority to demand a new formula when the old one worked fine? It's right here: ________.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@Kathrynv904@espinsegall if one of these is better, why apply a 50 yr old formula that's out of date? http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/06/23/us/voting-rights-act-map.html?_r=0 …2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @kkaplan
@kkaplan@Kathrynv904@espinsegall The decision, by the text of the Constitution, is up to Congress. Not the Court.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@kkaplan@Kathrynv904@espinsegall The idea that "I could do it better" is precisely what I mean by arrogance, whether of JGR or anyone else1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@Kathrynv904@espinsegall what about rights States have to set Voting regs? Wouldn't an outdated formula overstep those rights?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.