.@espinsegall @Profepps @MikeSacksHP That makes no sense. He's saying I was not wrong. On HuffPo he said "yes, absolutely" wrong.
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@espinsegall@MikeSacksHP So he either wasn't wrong, or may have been wrong, or was wrong. But OTHERS can't say he WAS wrong.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
.
@Profepps@espinsegall@MikeSacksHP I go back to my characterization of this as a really strange walk-back.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
The TNR piece might have been written before the show. But even if it wasn't, the piece is about the book.
@rickhasen@Profepps@MikeSacksHP2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall@rickhasen@Profepps@MikeSacksHP Either way, it still leaves Posner terminally inconsistent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmaz
"Might" be wrong v. "absolutely" wrong is not "terminally inconsistent." RT
@bmaz:@rickhasen@Profepps@MikeSacksHP2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall@bmaz@rickhasen@MikeSacksHP "did not recant" v. "Absolutely," on the other hand ....1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
My last shot.In TNR He says he may well have been wrong in Crawford then defends saying it publicly.
@Profepps@bmaz@rickhasen@MikeSacksHP1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall@bmaz@rickhasen@MikeSacksHP in TNR he pretends press reaction is erroneous response to book; misrepresentation.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
No Garrett, not "erroneous" just overblown. That's why he defends judges changing their minds.
@Profepps@bmaz@rickhasen@MikeSacksHP1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@espinsegall @bmaz @rickhasen @MikeSacksHP yes, Eric, he says he "did not say" what he did say, pretending press reaction was about book.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.