Could #SCOTUS use VRA case to beef up 10th Amendment & breathe new life into Art.IV's Republican Form of Govt clause? Thoughts, @rickhasen ?
-
-
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
@MikeSacksHP@rickhasen Is there mention of Guaranty Clause anywhere in the briefing or lower court op? Why would the court open that can?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@rickhasen no idea, but they're surely not talking about fugitive slave clause by citing Art4 in the QP...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
@MikeSacksHP@rickhasen weird thing to plead guaranty clause most ANTI-state provision in 1787 Constitution1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@rickhasen P&I clause? Full Faith & Credit? So confused.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Profepps
@Profepps@rickhasen trying to figure our which clause if Art4#SCOTUS is talking about in the QP in today's cert grant1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeSacksEsq
@MikeSacksHP@Profepps@rickhasen The reference to Article IV was in petitioner's QP and petition (p.1) http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/12-96-Shelby-County-v-Holder-Petition-for-a-Writ-of-Certiorari.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@crescat @mikesackshp @rickhasen It has to be Art. IV Sec. 4 and its wacky.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.