I fail to see what the problem is here. If the review fairly characterized the show, how is it offensive? ‘I am ashamed’: Beto apologizes for ‘demeaning comments about women’https://politi.co/2QozSxn
-
-
As I read it, he suggested the women in the show were hired based upon their physical endowments instead of their talent. Is it inconceivable a show might have been put together that way? Is it really offensive to point that out? Do we really care he wrote that at 19?
-
The last question is a good one, but as for the rest, I want to make sure you really don't understand why a review like that offends a lot of people. For true? Pinky swear?
-
The review may have been juvenile, but it's not offensive, and shouldn't be seen that way (perhaps other than by the performers, who might be offended by the suggestion that they lacked talent).
-
Not being contumacious (really) but I find it to be otiose to tell other people differently from me that they "shouldn't" be offended by something because it doesn't offend me. I can see why people object to that kind of review.
-
I am willing to say that too many people are too quick to take offense, and this seems like a good example (especially because I doubt many of Beto's critics are raising this issue in good faith).
-
Well, again, de gustibus and I am not sure of the unconcerned position that enables any individual to be the judge of what "should" offend others. The "good faith" point is a good one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.