Laurent Pech

1/ Preliminary point: This is not a "White Paper" but attempt to justify/whitewash a posteriori “reforms” which are however nothing but a set of rushed, interconnected and unconstitutional attacks on Polish judiciary: https://verfassungsblog.de/was-the-commission-right-to-activate-pre-article-7-and-art-71-procedures-against-poland/ … #ResistDoubleSpeakpic.twitter.com/NGUAsUoTZZ

2/ Key point: @TimmermansEU of @EU_Commission demanded *implementation* of its recommendations by 20 March but Polish gov arguing nothing to implement as no problems whatsoever only misunderstandings... #TakingUsforFoolspic.twitter.com/ZvNg2qajup

4/ WP approach not novel as favourite strategy of new breed of autocrats is to hide behind practices from good states and claim double standards if they are criticised: see e.g. https://blogs.eui.eu/constitutionalism-politics-working-group/populist-constitutionalism-6-kim-lane-scheppele-autocratic-legalism/ … or https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-100-issue-4/stealth-authoritarianism/ … #ComparativeLawAutocratStylepic.twitter.com/NlUl7sqLUx

5/ To limit length of thread will try to offer a flavour of WP by selecting a few of most ludicrous, misleading & outright lies which abound in Polish WP starting with para 1 – Will not tackle data/claims which I already proved to be nonsense/misleading: https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/966597726120103936 …pic.twitter.com/uhfU8Xmhvm

6/ I can only spot six problems with two sentences of para 1... (i) WJP doesn’t measure “public trust” in judicial systems (in fact word ‘trust’ not used once in WJP analysis…) (ii) Civil justice only 1 out of 8 benchmarks…pic.twitter.com/OdGZVIIOyV

7/ (iii) WP forgets to mention what @TheWJP said in Jan 2018: “Significant trends included a deterioration in Constraints on Government Powers, Open Government, Fundamental Rights, and Criminal Justice” = declining trends since PiS took over and nothing to do with civil justice…pic.twitter.com/VptiMIejlc

8/ (iv) WP uses income ranking group rather than EU/EFTA/NA grouping of 24 to paint worst possible picture (v) WP also forgets to refer to 2017 EU Justice scoreboard which measures trusts and offers a more nuanced picture…pic.twitter.com/0AM9zKwLh4

10/ To spare you from super long thread will attempt to select a few of most ludicrous claims & will leave out where WP contradicts itself when offering misleading info (compare eg World Bank data re commercial proceedings v MoJ suggesting 14-month duration)pic.twitter.com/IGJlQyCSrU

11/ Re “failure to account for the communist past” WP offers evidence-free analysis: WP doesn’t tell us e.g. how many sitting SCt judges we’re talking about considering dismissal of 80% of SCt judges when communism ended...pic.twitter.com/fwm4m3Raon

12/ Twisted logic: Principle of independent judiciary would violate principle of separation of powers with notion of balance of powers understood in a one-way street manner: must benefit only "external agents" (executive/legislative powers) but not the judiciary itself… hmm...pic.twitter.com/LZqzKGTMNo

13/ Cherry-picking: Loved the audacity of this point which is made in a report which systematically cherry-picks evidence & misrepresents it while also systematically ignoring contrary evidence… Polish gov appears to work on basis of assumption we're idiotspic.twitter.com/lmKVIR9h5D

14/ Trivia: Also loved set of colours used by WP in its executive summaries with surprise surprise red used when summarising features of “the system so far”; green for so-called “significant changes” & blue of course for naturally positive “effect of the reform” #SoCutepic.twitter.com/nP4FKj9ab2

15/ Age discrimination & stereotyping: in addition to being past communist collaborators Senior Polish judges are of course by definition lethargic compared to naturally dynamic young judges… time for a purge sorry a “rejuvenation” based on (assumed) political beliefs & age...pic.twitter.com/7Xby8HeIR2

16/ Wait I thought all of Polish senior judges were communist traitors but you are now telling me average age per category of judges varies btw 45 & 55… Does that mean current judges were btw 16 & 26 when communism collapsed? no need for more evidence as this is so compelling...pic.twitter.com/QBnfj7zDPc

17/ Slow-motion purge: Happy of course to trust Polish gov as it has only purged 18.6% of court presidents/deputy presidents so far (this speed = 100% in 3 years) & no worries there’s NCJ (which ruling party controls & put in place in breach of Const but minor detail of course)pic.twitter.com/ebO8PRAtqZ

18/ Finally something innovative when it comes to misleading people: 1st time I have seen autocratic government trying to highlight apparent contradictions btw int bodies but strangely enough WP forgot to reproduce strident criticism of ODIHR in its reports on Polish laws…pic.twitter.com/IsolHZO05U

19/ Election of President of Const Tribunal may have been unconstitutional but don’t worry the same President found her election to be constitutional with the help of the other judges we got appointed to Constitutional Tribunal when deciding this matter in her new capacity…pic.twitter.com/CJs6gpBNPl

20/ But Constitution doesn't matter as election was acknowledged also by former deputy President of Tribunal. Only minor problem he appeared to have said opposite at the time - fake news I am sure then: http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/285610,President-appoints-new-head-of-Poland%E2%80%99s-top-court …pic.twitter.com/sC3V9fHnwU

21/ Just one more ludicrous point as I am getting tired… Commission never had any concerns about inability of captured Const Tribunal to pro-actively help ruling party violate Constitution at will… WP again insulting our intelligence. #Article7 procedure should continue ENDpic.twitter.com/v3hKIsxFZG