Margot Cleveland

This is embarrassing for you.

...because???

Because you clearly didn't read the study. Or even the abstract. Or, if you did, you didn't understand either. It's about the treatment of depression. It's not about memory. The "artificial situations" are about processing difficult emotions, not creating false memories.

ummm, I did both and I know what it was saying and explained it in my "follow-up" to trolls. I never said she did it to create false memories. But she suffers from anxiety & PTSD-and using an "artificial situation" to process increases risk of false memories as does hypnosis.

You doing both then shows further that you are biased to your specific thesis. Right here, what you are saying is that it does create false memories, but then said that you weren't saying it did. No, you only suggested that it did. This is why you can't be taken seriously.

No, I said she didn't USE it to create false memories, like she hypnotized herself to intentionally crease false memory. I think it creates reasonable inference that she used hypnosis & possibly self-hypnosis to address her trauma & that it created false memories by its nature.

So you saying she accidentally mesmerized herself? That is more plausible than her actual given story?

Nope. Try again.

Now do Kavanaugh's calendar entry where he went to have beers with the people Ford said he was having beers with

You mean some of the people? Whom she knew hung out? And PJ, Judge said no recollection of such a party and PJ only had 1 beer? And her longtime friend said never met Kavanaugh and never remembered that party? The one where her friend ran out of the house & ditched her?

You must be super proud of how your efforts impact women who have been victimized. I suspect your ancestors must have been right there with the Kavanaugh’s running the Salem Witch trials. Hope you received decent compensation for this.

Do you know who is impacting women who have been victimized? The Democrats. They are using horribly a woman who has obviously suffered some great trauma--big T or little t-and by saying if you don't believe her story, victims won't be believed, it causes victims to believe that

Ludicrous. She came forward on her own. Your tweet called into question her very credible testimony & it did so in an underhanded fashion. Then there’s kavanaugh who was clearly unhinged and lying throughout his testimony. #Beer #Ralphing #DevilsTriangle #Boofing #July1st1982

Bingo. Sorry: you either today a coin on he said / she said and wait for preponderance of evidence and motives to guide you, or your default is "hes right and she needs to prove her case beyond a polygraph, threat of perjury, etc. RE perjury, he committed it a half dozen times.

So a lawyer and Judge who knows the laws better than anyone Purjured himself 6 times. Could you list them please!!

Ok I stopped reading as soon as I read 5 times judge Kavenaugh "APPEARS" to be lying. But nice try

Bubba, I know reading is hard for you folks, but understanding the use of words to present context that doesn’t lead to a libel suit is how most journalist write, but I digress. Still missing the point of his previous judgeship confirmation taking years...

uh oh.. ive been wondering about this possibility. #1 rule of hypnotic regression work is no leading questions.. ie if you get hypnotized to find out if youve been abducted by UFO, and he/she asks, "do you see a bright light in the sky?", well you can guess what you'll "remember"

should note its unknown whether she was hypnotized re: alleged assault (I found her to be credible, absent political context) but it would be helpful to find out if she was, and not just what she said, but just as importantly what the therapist might have said / suggested

Just because she professionally studied something doesn't mean she participated. Generally researchers do just that research.