There's no experiment that demonstrates that the universe birthed into existence on its own (that is to say from nothing/without an intervention of non-physical kind) Yet many scientists religiously hold the said theory near&dear to their heart. The theory is also un-mathematical
-
-
-
The experiment can only be so good as our instruments of measurements (our senses) which are imperfect to begin with. Quantum Mechanics shows us that sometimes logic & experiment do not agree with each other. So what does that say about the "truth of the theory" Mr. Feynman?
-
".. which are imperfect to begin with." Only Platonic forms are perfect. What are we to do?
-
In search for truth one cannot rely on faulty instruments. You can live your whole life believing a reality which approximates your senses or a reality of pure logic.
-
We are f u c k e d either way!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One experiment is worth a thousand expert opinions
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That puts String Theory firmly in the realm of Philosophy and not Science. Thank You
-
Bingo! By Kant's criteria, string theory would fall under metaphysics ... and probably bad metaphysics at that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for sharing this, it makes the point clearly. Just one coda — the experiment needs to be well designed and replicated. I know you know this. I just want others to understand.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think the russians where the authors of the genius statement "Never trust an experiment that you did not falsified yourself !"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Loving this images writing down in a blackboard with chalk: much better and informative than PowerPoint
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Climate scientists take note.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
"Dick"? Because I make an incontrovertible point about how science must be done? You are weird, mon.
-
So. Climate change science is wrong? Please explain.
-
Climate science has not produced definitive results, so any claims made on the basis of it are without value. What Feynman aims at is the dispassionate objective nature of science. Climate "science" is a bunch of Left wing people bleating at a bunch of right wing people.
-
So what experiments do you propose that would prove or disprove the science definitely?
-
So, not about science but politics?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.