THREAD on June Medical Services v. Gee
Three years ago, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that is identical to this one in Louisiana. There is no reason why the Court should have to take this issue up again, unless it plans to rule differently.
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
The only thing that has changed between then & now is the addition of 2 anti-choice Justices. It’s clear, by announcing that it will hear this case,
#SCOTUS is going to start rolling back the constitutionally-protected right to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion.1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
There is no bigger threat to Americans’ right to have an abortion than the current make up of this Supreme Court. We cannot continue to rely on the highest court in our land to protect our rights under Roe v. Wade.
1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
H.R. 2975, the Women’s Health Protection Act, would ensure that every person, regardless of their zip code, would have access to abortion services free from medically unnecessary restrictions like this Louisiana law.
4 proslijeđena tweeta 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
It is time for Congress to act and put the protections that have been guaranteed under Roe v. Wade into law. The Pro-Choice Caucus stands ready to lead the charge, protect Roe v. Wade, and fight for reproductive health care as a human right. #MyRightMyDecision
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.