Paul, Just to qualify he’s not the former chief of defence staff but he was head of UK forces in Iraq at one time. A good friend of mine served with him, his men loved him and I agree with your comments re Sky cutting him off. Its madness.
Former head of British Armed Forces says Assad had no motivation to carry out chemical weapons attack, promptly gets cut off by Sky News host. Just a coincidence!pic.twitter.com/6hYYYxrBM7
-
-
-
How very interesting - the Gov line is falling apart at the seams
-
Tweet unavailable
-
How disappointed they must be that our enemies are being conquered
-
#USSstrike This interview was right after Russian ambassador's long-winded speech. It was 27 minutes past the hour and time for a commercial break. Not a conspiracy. Pro-Putin far-right & far-left extremists have totally lost the plot. In Dictator#Putin We Trust (not)!pic.twitter.com/UjgOCwTB3t
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. Blatantly obvious. Sky News didn't want that info / line of thinking to get out.
-
Exactly!!!!!The other narrative they have created is to always associate Putin with the Assad regime. Lol it’s funny because the USA propped up Mobutu Seko’s regime in the DRC, stole over 10billion USD and led his nation into civil war. Do we associate US presidents with Mobutu?
-
From what I read in multiple places it was the CIA backed Al Nusra Front that was behind the last chemical attack and not Assad
-
So it's clear now that the motive for the bombing of Syria is not to take out a "monster" (i.e., humanitarian reasons). As one writer put it, Syria is "another pipeline war". See this article at http://zerohedge.com https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-24/oil-gas-war-over-syria-4-maps …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Questioning May's fib about Assad using chemical bombs doesn't suit MSM propaganda. They're selling lies to people as they did before the Iraq War. But people aren't buying.
@BillionIndian@realDonaldTrump@j_chatwani@FLOTUS@KTHopkins@AMDWaters@Celinetruths01@fubaglady - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.