-
-
-
The memo is useless lol
-
Lol. I understand your cognitive dissonance. Somehow I don't think you'll be able to continue to live in denial when the IG report comes out. Enjoy it until then.
-
You should really take in the rest of the MAGA days you got left




-
Lol. You should really say no to mind control.





-
Ok comrade
-
Alicia has 8 random number on the end of her twitter handle and has no profile pic. Aka this is a bot.
#byealicia - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It said none of that lmao
-
Do you care about what it actually says? It says the fisa warrants were obtained illegally!! Unverified dossier to obtain illegal fisa warrants! Conspiracy between Clinton, Obama, FBI, DOJ to take Trump down. Wth is wrong with you liberals??
-
Actually it doesnt... do you know how the law works?
-
Please educate me on the law. Tell me how any of what in the dossier is true, and what in the memo isn't. show proof. If they had nothing to hide they wouldn't have been fighting so hard to keep it secret. They want to prove collusion don't they?
-
Page had already been under investigation by the FBI, since 2013. He had a renewal in June 2016. All FISA requirements had already been met when they renewed again, regardless of Fusion GPS. Steele reported to Fusion GPS--not the FBI--which had been funded by GOP for 9 months.
-
This memo is an opinion piece full of talking points by Nunes, who has a terrible track record here. Also, they say at the end that the Trump investigation is due to Papadopoulos, not Page. So.......?
-
That's your opinion. Nunez has been a huge part of the investigation. He's not just some dude who just wrote up a memo really quick. Why aren't you concerned about what's in it? Prove that what he said was not true
-
What would you like me to refute? I already outlined how the majority of his talking points are moot, and the fundamental conclusion of the memo itself has no merit. I'm happy to discuss it with you, however.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I have no idea what’s in the Mueller investigation except everyone seems terrified of it... But “Hyper-partisan”... pls explain. Comey? Republican. Wray? Republican. Mueller? Republican. Sessions? Republican. Rosenstein? Republican. Is upholding Constitution is pro-Democrat?
-
Did you just say upholding the constitution? Lol. Like Snowden Leaks? Like Vault 7? Like using a paid document from one campaign as part of basis for domestic spying on the other? Like IRS targeting? Tell me- please- what has been constitutional about this?
-
True that! And don’t forget Roswell, Deflategate, the JFK assassination, the Wakanda denial, the weapon X program & those fake Duke boys they tried to pass off on us that season!!
-
So you simply do not care about constitutional freedoms and government overreach is what you’re saying? Cool. At least we really know where you stand
-
Sorry, misunderstood.. I’m also concerned any attempted interference w/ any of the Russian Election influence investigations is a threat to constitutional freedoms & government overreach. We stand in the same place, friend. (Although still want to get to bottom of Wakanda stuff)
-
I can appreciate that. But here we stand 16 months into this “investigation” and the no arrests made that pertain to a timeline of Trump campaign. What is known though is that: The party that brought us Snowden & Vault 7 decided to lie to monitor the oppositions nom.
-
Watergate took I think 2 years plus. Clinton was investigated about the same. Yet we are complaining about the timeline? If we are trying to get to the truth, who cares how long it takes. The truth proved Bill was lying about a blow job so again, let this play out.
-
Well said it’s going to take a lot longer than 2 years it’s way bigger than most people realize
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.